RYSLIG - MODS (
rysligmods) wrote2016-06-28 08:50 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Entry tags:
MOD CONTACT
◉ NAVIGATION ▼
Plurk:
ryslig
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT US BY PLURK UNLESS IT IS AN EMERGENCY. USE THIS POST FOR ANY PM SINCE IT IS SCREENED AND WILL NOTIFY US.
BENNU
Plurk:
himewako
CARBON
Plurk:
carbonate
MEOWZY
Plurk:
Meowzy
KRYSTAL
Plurk:
athensbrat
Personal plurks are listed for reference, but please don't PM them with mod-related questions, as it's best if all of us can see everything.
If you have a question about game mechanics, please comment to the FAQ. If you want to submit a plot proposal, use the Plot Suggestions post. Otherwise, questions or concerns regarding either the game as a whole or a specific player can be posted here. Anonymous comments are enabled on this post, and IPs are not logged unless you are posting anonymously. Let us know in your comment if you'd like the thread to be unscreened at any point.
◉ MEME◉ OOC
◉ NETWORK◉ MAIN◉ NAVIGATION▲
Plurk:
PLEASE DO NOT CONTACT US BY PLURK UNLESS IT IS AN EMERGENCY. USE THIS POST FOR ANY PM SINCE IT IS SCREENED AND WILL NOTIFY US.
BENNU
Plurk:
CARBON
Plurk:
MEOWZY
Plurk:
KRYSTAL
Plurk:
Personal plurks are listed for reference, but please don't PM them with mod-related questions, as it's best if all of us can see everything.
If you have a question about game mechanics, please comment to the FAQ. If you want to submit a plot proposal, use the Plot Suggestions post. Otherwise, questions or concerns regarding either the game as a whole or a specific player can be posted here. Anonymous comments are enabled on this post, and IPs are not logged unless you are posting anonymously. Let us know in your comment if you'd like the thread to be unscreened at any point.
no subject
We've never listed specific standards for what qualifies as a rejection, but as a general rule of thumb if every section needs to be rewritten or specifically addressed, that usually results in us rejecting the application with an offer of private consultation so that they can rewrite the problem areas with a little more guidance. As for revisions, if the team feels they fall short, we will have to default to a rejection. There were a lot of tough calls this time around, and we can admit we're definitely not foolproof.
We'll definitely be adding what we can to the next state of the game to address any issues of confusion and looking into potentially offering up alternative solutions like application review volunteers that can proofread for anyone needing assistance! So thank you again for your suggestion, we're pinning it to the fridge, we promise.
no subject
(Anonymous) 2015-10-04 11:11 am (UTC)(link)no subject
Again, we're looking to examine the process itself to make it more consistent during this month's state of the game, so being notified of problematic issues like this helps us a great deal!